For this lesson, I am bringing a game out of my archives to explore an exciting QGD counter-attack line, challenging some bad cliches
like ” stockfish plays the queens gambit, so I do too ”
and ” no Queen no Mate ”
or ” I’m just trying to force a quick draw ”
& ” if you retreat, I’ll win “
“some chess cliches have a time and place in the blitz arena, but typically, they’ll just lead you to a lower rating over the board..play your opponent..and keep these in mind instead ..”Coach Chad
” don’t stop your opponent from making mistakes ”
” mistakes become mating nets “
” whomever makes the last blunder loses “
In today’s game, black challenges the Queen’s Gambit opening by declining the gambit with a counter-gambit commonly referred to as the Queen’s Gambit Declined: Austrian Variation. White defers the counter-gambit and so, black forces them to activate their queen to equalize the pawn exchange on d5..from this point, white seems to have the initiative but black has many options to regain tempo through the power of intermezzo. It seems like white could maintain hold over the center throughout this opening..with a single pawn advantage.. but the Austrian Variation can also encourage white to quickly simplify the game by forcefully trading queens, or castling without developing other pieces first.
My analysis adds context to a quick game from the bullet arena at the amateur level, around 1200. It studies a legitimate opening worth pondering for all players, and especially those who play the school of Queen’s Gambit and Queen’s Gambit Declined openings. This game seems unique because black finds zwishenzug with 5 ..Nc6 to counter-attack against the queen and potentially encourage an early trade of the matriarchs while the white pieces remain behind in development. I will do a deeper search to see if this line arises often between the 1800 or 2200 levels for a more advanced positional analysis.
In my game, following the opening pawn battle, white forces a knight trade on f6 followed by the trading of queens at d8. White seems to be attempting to either thwart black’s opportunities to castle or to force black’s knight to retreat from c6…perhaps just trying to secure a small material lead..
However..this time..despite some ugly pawn activity..the retreating knight actually becomes advantageous for black..control over central squares e5 and d4 is still an active playing field..the doubled f-pawns could eventually become useful decoys. And furthermore, the retreat does no harm to black’s ideas because white is behind in development and cannot secure central positional squares without waiting moves like e3 or g3; Bf4 is predictable..
With the material score reading 26 v 25, white seems to have a lead out of the opening..but they are lacking in ideas. Any inaccuracies from either side could allow for the opposition to maintain uptempo positional advantages.
At the same time, this opening variation actually seems to offer better middle-game ideas for black to secure an early mating net, or strong knight outposts..despite being down a pawn ..it’s unclear whether white should leverage their material lead for a positional advantage..maybe begin planning even further ahead to find a drawish fortress or prepare for a potential counter-attack.
Sure enough, after the early exchange of knights and queens, white attempted to control a dark squared bishop outpost on f4, but black’s patient pawn at e7 capitalized on the opportunity to gain back a tempo with 8. ..e5, and the bishop is forced to decide between: a) retreating along the c1-h6 diagonal to remain a trustworthy defender on the queenside, with potential endgame attacks against black’s kingside, or b) retreating to g3 and remain optimistic for a middle-game attack against black’s queenside.
The captain of the white pieces chose option b) and thus, black immediately answered the inaccuracy with 9 ..Bb4+ and now, despite the uptempo exchanges by white early on, black has refuted the queen’s gambit positionally and has begun building a mating net by move 10.
From here this game exemplifies the power of development in misbalanced positions, and transposes a common opening into several puzzling positions where tactics apply undeniable pressure.
Bullet chess is rarely perfect, and I mean no disrespect by pointing to mistakes. In fact, black nearly lost the hard-fought lead with the aggressive, but inaccurate, follow-through of 10. ..e4 11. Nh4 Bd2+. The line looks strong and uptempo, with the potential to force a blunder, especially something like 12. Kd1.
But there was another interesting pathway for white to capitalize in the long term with open space on the queenside; 14. a3 — this line is far from forcing and black still has many opportunities for counter-play..it would have been interesting! Ultimately black would have been best to just play 10 ..Na5 and continue developing quietly towards a queenside knight outpost.
Nevertheless, without queens on the board, and perhaps a slight time advantage, black remained calm through the opening battle and kept up the pressure to bring forth some tactics.
..but if I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a thousand times..”perfection is over-rated!!”Coach Chad
And therefore, my intuition to play aggressively, against a passive opponent was a stepping stone towards victory.
Eventually, black is able to play 15. ..Nb4+ followed with 16 ..Be6 to further complicate any plans for white. With the pawn now pinned to c4.. black is owning the initiative throughout the central squares. The king is stuck in an uncomfortably cramped position on white’s queenside..if only there were a queen around to step in and redirect the momentum away from the mating net..but alas, the queens are watching from the sidelines..
The last hopes for white finally vanish with the seemingly innocent 17. Be2; failing to find the only remaining drawish response of 17. a3. With this blunder, black reiterates total control over c4; 17. ..b5.. and the white king ought to panic.
The sequence from 12. ..O-O-O+ to 16. ..Be6 showcases the flexibility of accurately developed pieces; leading to forceful tactics and zugzwang.. and ultimately leading black to a beautiful mate against white’s under-defended king on move 19. This is a clever positional win for black, looking beyond material scores, to capitalize on a misplaced bishop…perhaps they’d like a rematch!
If we slow the last moves down, it seems like a more accurate attack would have ended the game after: 18. Rad1 bxc4 19. Bxc4 Rd3+! 20. Ka4 (forced) Bxc4 (+3)
Nevertheless, after 16. ..Be6 every move for white including 17. Be2 seems like zugzwang to me..they are hard pressed to find anything reasonable… by move 19. … Ka3 is the only savior and it looks pretty-ugly too; ..a4# is a beauty.
Check out the fluid exchanges and momentum swings in my video commentary: “Bullet Battles with Coach Chad: QGD: Austrian Variation, beauty, 19. ..a4#” **COMING SOON**
Chess.com’s computer says, “INTENSE – Nice win. You were never in trouble.”
Check out the full game: larros vs 11brosehttps://www.chess.com/live/game/5278155175